DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR770-14
29 Jul 14
I
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
28 July 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 4050 LPb-2
dated 5 May 2014, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. ,
Sincerely,
TR en OO
ROBERT D.~ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Rnclosure: HOMC memo 4050 LPD-2 dtd 5 May 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1336 RCT dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5471 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on _ 8 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 23 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR5471-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6014 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NkRé014-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3276 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3276-14 rrection of an official naval Consequentiy, when applying for a co demonstrate the existence De record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1865 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2 dated 11 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4499 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval ord and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR4499-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0529 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. In addition, the Board on furnished by HoMc memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 9 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2618 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 23 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR998 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR- 3 dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. In this Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...